• Home
  • about
    • professional
    • personal
    • contact
  • research
    • interactional language
    • language and emotions
    • language and cognition
    • human machine interaction
    • categories
    • pronouns
    • other
    • new papers
    • upcoming and recent talks
  • supervision
    • postdocs
    • current PhD students
    • former PhD students
  • teaching
    • the linguistics of AI halucinations
    • the syntax of talking heads
  • outreach
    • videos
    • my medium posts
    • media
  • Blog
  • news
  • Language and cognition

Linguistics as a cognitive enterprise

As a generativist, I am interested in what we know when we know a language, which is of course a cognitive question. The Chomskyan revolution has thus made the study of language a cognitive enterprise. It is thus perhaps surprising that generativists found themselves at (linguistic) wars with linguists that are sometimes referred to as cognitive linguists. While both groups are ultimately interested in how language is embedded into our cognition, their answers differ (hence the wars). Generativists have long held the belief that language is special, autonomous, only interfacing with (but not directly influenced by other) aspects of cognition. In contrast, cognitive linguists have it that language is shaped by general cognition. With the advent of minimalism (and talk about third factors), things have changed a bit and the difference between the two approaches is diminishing, perhaps.

Questions I explore

How do children acquire language? What does the linguistic profile of neuro-diverse populations tell us?

My interests

Up until the publication of my monograph on interactional language, I was mostly interested in the linguistic reality of the generalizations I explored and of the analyses I developed. Though, the universal spine hypothesis and the interactional spine hypothesis have some semblance to generative semantics approaches which is at the root of some cognitive approaches to linguistics. I was led to think that syntactic structure is not just structure, it is structure with some content (the spine). And the content I proposed is part of it lends itself to exploring its relation to general cognition. And that's what I am interested now. The cognitive significance of the generalizations and analyses I have explored thus far. There are various empirical domains that I explore, which are ultimately questions about the relation between language and cognition.
What does grammar tell us about the nature of knowledge?
What is the relation between language and emotion?
Copyright © 2020 Network Solutions, LLC, A Web.com Company. All rights reserved.

We use cookies to enable essential functionality on our website, and analyze website traffic. By clicking Accept you consent to our use of cookies. Read about how we use cookies.

Your Cookie Settings

We use cookies to enable essential functionality on our website, and analyze website traffic. Read about how we use cookies.

Cookie Categories
Essential

These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our websites. You cannot refuse these cookies without impacting how our websites function. You can block or delete them by changing your browser settings, as described under the heading "Managing cookies" in the Privacy and Cookies Policy.

Analytics

These cookies collect information that is used in aggregate form to help us understand how our websites are being used or how effective our marketing campaigns are.